post a comment refresh page

Rocketboom

101 Comments on Evolution Explainer

  1. “…got hit by lightening or salt and suddenly mutated into a moving thing?”

    The validity of Darwin’s theory of evolution rests on the second largest conundrum

    in human history. That is, how did the single cell organism come into existence. Poo-pooing this fact away

    with “…just try not to worry about it…” seems quite arrogant. Shall we deny the basic tenets of science?

    Even today’s top Darwinists and Evolutionists cannot answer this question even though they have found

    kleenex boxes that are over 500 million years old containing petrified whale snot.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
    1. Actually, there’s a whole field of science dedicated to that conundrum called Abiogenesis. I’ve already got a script in the can on that subject. And now…we wait.

      3 years ago  ∞
      Reply
      1. There may be a whole field of science dedicated to finding the answer, however my point was that nobody really knows. Abiogenesis is a cool name though. I’m sure the Intelligent Design people love using it.

        BTW, there’s also a whole field of science dedicated to researching Mentos & Coke. Hey, maybe there’s the smoking gun….?

        3 years ago  ∞
        Reply (Comments won't nest below this level)
      2. Rick

        Going into great detail about it or not, this theory still remains a better explanation than its main alternative… God. According to Darwin, although a situation may seem improbable, there is always a chance because of time and/or natural selection. In the case that God made something appear out of nothing, the question still remains well then what made God? There is no explanation or chance yet put forward to answer that… here, Darwin does put something forward and allows time to do the rest.

        3 years ago  ∞
        Reply
      3. No one is disagreeing with Darwin or evolution. The question posed was “where did the first organic single cell organism” come from? Amazing how so many are afraid to say ” I don’t know.”

        3 years ago  ∞
        Reply
      4. Rick

        i dont know

        3 years ago  ∞
        Reply
      5. 3 years ago  ∞
        Reply
  2. C-C

    Joanne said “… originally it was just a fluke …” and that was funny because a fluke is one of the lobes of a whale’s tail.

    I’m always up for a good party but why are we celebrating Chuckie D’s b-day 4 months early and with an 9 month old episode?

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  3. planexzeropoint

    yes the genetic make up remains the same whats your point?

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  4. SonomaDave1

    I recently saw someone wearing jeans with no booty in them, AND no undergarments. Will they become whalelike too? Or will their faded jeans just get ratty like mine and die a Goodwill-type death?

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  5. SuperFinGuy

    planexzeropoint if you think that random mutation is just a bad hypothesis for evolution ok but an actual scientific theory is an explanation of the facts.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  6. planexzeropoint

    there you all have my email now. hope this clears up my position.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  7. Rybot9000

    I didn’t say anything of the sort.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  8. Zarbod

    Dave, if their jeans are ratty their genes won’t be going no where.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  9. bollkg2008

    if you like alien movies just watch the prophecy trailer. you`ll find it when you type in prophecy teaser 2. movie will come to theaters 2010.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  10. SonomaDave1

    So instead of “the road to nowhwere” they have the genes to nowhere! I think I am beginning to gets it.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  11. excelgeo

    this was the rocketboom episode that got me interested in the channel

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  12. WiiLuxio

    2:50=hawt.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  13. Zarbod

    Well I know my genes are going nowhere.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  14. Tanru2000

    A lot of people find evolution a difficult concept to grasp… it happens on such a huge time-scale that it’s easier to accept ‘intelligent design’ rather than subtle mutations and selection pressure over millions of years. I think it’s hard to picture a group of 12 things in your mind let alone, 100 or 1000 or 1000000!

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  15. jsfitzgerrel

    making our main goal to reproduce is suicide.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  16. jsfitzgerrel

    so are cigs but gotta have em

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  17. halabalo195

    reupload?

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  18. GaretTheAssassin

    planexzeropoint- You, sir, are a fool. I may be a fool as well, but at least I’m not as closed minded.

    Just because goats never flew, doesn’t mean other lifeforms didn’t evolve to suit the environment. Your logic is arbitrary, not to mention annoying.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  19. realgiantbison

    I like rocketboom!

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  20. donrane

    Its not really a huge time-scale if you think about it.. Look what humans have done to dogs just over a few human generations.. We have formed them to our needs as we have with many other animals like cows and pigions..and thats has been done in a very short timespan.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  21. killwhiteyvoteoboma

    I really like the whole Monty Python aspect of the visuals - goes gr8 W/her UK vibe! More like this pls! =]

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  22. Tanru2000

    True - but those are still the one species. Think about how long and how many mutations require a wing or… lungs. Boggles the mind.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  23. hjeremy2222

    This was the first rocketboom I saw

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  24. contents99

    There’s always going to a missing link. Every time a intermediate fossil is found, there are two more missing links either side and so on.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  25. zephyrmaster00Z

    Bull. Shit.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  26. xJaysrox

    coool

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  27. ELuhn

    Well. Reasoned.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  28. ELuhn

    It’s a clone.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  29. C-C

    How come Joanne didn’t get to go play in CO with the rest of you?

    Elie for “Burger Queen”!

    Yatta, the windshield looks clean to me!

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
    1. It was such a fun trip!!! :) We worked the entire time, oh, and yes, I did eat some burgers, too. I love getting fast food when I’m away from the city. I can eat like a 500lb man. NOMNOM!!

      And Yatta did a good job with the winshield, but ya know… I have to tease ;)

      3 years ago  ∞
      Reply
  30. ELuhn

    No, I knew a girl in high school whose jeans were practically falling off the bone. I’m *sure* she’s been knocked up by now.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  31. Kam

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
    1. Where’s Harpo Whale?

      3 years ago  ∞
      Reply
  32. Lica

    Did anybody notice that the date she says is February 12th 2008?

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
    1. we don’t notice things like that anymore, up is down and sideways always turns around

      3 years ago  ∞
      Reply
    2. WorldFamousBigB

      I’m glad you mentioned this. This is my first time here at rocketboom, and I was a little worried that perhaps updates were very rare.

      3 years ago  ∞
      Reply
  33. Newton

    Here’s a website that actually explains the concept of evolution and natural selection fairly well if you have the time to watch some of these lengthy videos. They talk about quite a few different scientific topics but the spend a bit of time on the whole Darwin thing.

    http://www.cassiopeiaproject.com/videos.php

    It isn’t quite a flashy as the chainsaw removing whale legs but they do have some really cool visuals.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  34. Rybot9000

    Yea… it comes from a long history of epistemic inquiry. From Pyrrhonism to Academic Scepticism. A “theory” broadly speaking is an attempt to explain the facts. Absolute Certainty is a fallacy so a theory is not “Absolute Truth”. In Science a theory is an explanation which fits the facts, has been peer-reviewed and accepted as an adequate account. Much different than colloquial usage.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  35. Howie47

    Darwin tried cutting the tails off of dogs. He found it was never passed on. Genetic (deformities) are rarely passed on. Never seen a species of two headed snakes. Although some of them live to adult and mate.
    Yep, you got to be pretty desperate to believe that fairy tale.
    Devolution is what is happening; and we got a whole world of idiots that proves it.
    Happy Birthday Darwin. Hope you don’t regret that day. Peace

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  36. TechsysPete

    Is she making fun of it?

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  37. TechsysPete

    Is she making fun of it?

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  38. TechsysPete

    Is she making fun of it?

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  39. Firster

    Frankly, it’s quite beyond me how a thinking person could understand even a fraction of the unfathomable complexity of the human body and think that it developed in all of its delicate intricacy without some intelligent creative influence. The only conclusion I can draw is that there is a God, and He did it. So the question is who or what is this God and has He claimed any credit for His creation? In fact, He has, and his name is Jesus Christ.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
    1. Newton

      This is the same logic that used to be used for chemistry, physics, and other fields.

      “I can’t understand it so it must be too hard to understand so therefore some supernatural being must be present”.

      Don’t get me wrong, there is quite a bit that scientist don’t understand and I’m not saying that there isn’t a God (or Jesus) but to simply throw up your hands when things get too complex is an (educationally) defeatist attitude.

      3 years ago  ∞
      Reply
  40. MyStrangeNewMexico

    I like that Rocketboom wanted to make something in defense of evolution, but this is not a very good video. It downplays the amount of time most mutations take, downplays the incremental way those mutations are made, confuses evolution and abiogenesis, and chooses inaccurate and kind of ridiculous examples to make its point. Try it again, maybe.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  41. MyStrangeNewMexico

    I like that Rocketboom wanted to make something in defense of evolution, but this is not a very good video. It downplays the amount of time most mutations take, downplays the incremental way those mutations are made, confuses evolution and abiogenesis, and chooses inaccurate and kind of ridiculous examples to make its point. Try it again, maybe.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  42. MyStrangeNewMexico

    I like that Rocketboom wanted to make something in defense of evolution, but this is not a very good video. It downplays the amount of time most mutations take, downplays the incremental way those mutations are made, confuses evolution and abiogenesis, and chooses inaccurate and kind of ridiculous examples to make its point. Try it again, maybe.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  43. I’m having a whale of a time. Party on Gene Poole.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  44. leron

    Well, Jesus Christ.

    (Hey, I wasn’t the one who brought the guy up.)

    All I can tell you is, when I was a kid the weirdest adults, and the ones who treated me the worst, were the ones who dressed in funny black outfits and claimed to be doing the work of Jesus. One time as a 4th grader I was knocked to the ground and kicked multiple times by a nun, for the crime of touching a fire extinguisher with a single finger while on line in the hall. I remember lying there on the tiled hallway floor thinking, Jesus would never do this.

    I did develop the basic fist-fighting skills needed to co-exist with Cathilic boys at the time. I guess I’m grateful for that.

    But like many folks (including our new president), I come from a mix of backgrounds. Some of my relatives think Jesus is da bomb, while others from the other side of the tree think he was just a meshuggah kid who thought too much of himself. I decided long ago not to take sides in this fairy tale war.

    I feel closest to God sitting halfway up a mountain side at sunset, wearing good boots and holding a canteen of clean water and seeing no sign of human encroachment to the horizon, and knowing it’s a reasonable hike back to a campsite where a warm first and half a warmer sleeping bag will be weaiting for me. You can keep your big buildings and candles and incense.

    I hate creationism. Creationists try to use the complexity of biological life, and some people’s lack of knowledge and understand of that complexity, to justify their religious agenda. They pump out a lot of crap and call it science when in fact it is not, it has no predictive value whatsoever. Some of this crap is purveyed by people who know better, and who believe they are doing God’s work through deception. Uh, right.

    It’s sort of the same thing McCain and Palin were trying to do with the economy. Hey, trust us. (snort)

    I have never understood the preoccupation with figuring out how life started. Sure, for some it makes a nice career, but the rest of us? Just be glad you got a slice of what the Jews call “the astonishment of sentience.” There are better ways to spend all that time creationists spend trying to prove the unprovable, like perfecting your margarita recipe (Paris, looking at you here….).

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  45. darkangel2327

    last point was the really good.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  46. The comment section seeems to have er… mutated. There goes the neighborhood.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
    1. Kam

      No shit bro-ster, where’d they all come from? not that I’m apposed to new people just so long as they know the protocol here. Er…just what is the protocol here anyway?

      3 years ago  ∞
      Reply
      1. leron

        “Some of us have long lived on the edge, Daniel. It is possible if you observe rules. Just hang on by fingernails. And ever look down.”

        I think that covers it.

        3 years ago  ∞
        Reply (Comments won't nest below this level)
      2. Duck! Incoming API on the comments!

        3 years ago  ∞
        Reply
  47. leron

    sorry, i meant “never look down.”

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  48. mike_dixon

    Wow hey I just about wore out my scroll wheel here. Cool!

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  49. Now is timely or what!!!

    Here’s a chance for all you creationists to make 100,000 Turkish lira
    which is roughly around $60,000 US give or take a few pesos.

    http://us1.fmanager.net/api_v1/productDetail.php?dev-t=EDCRFV&objectId=11310

    Man if I weren’t so busy posting comments on RB, I’d take a crack at it.
    I could use the 60 grand.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
    1. Oh that was too easy. The answer is that there is no answer because we can never know. Or so it seems. Or something else.

      3 years ago  ∞
      Reply
  50. The fact that I don’t believe in evolution proves that it’s not true because evolution should not allow me to believe in something that is antithetical to itself. Haha. On a serious note, what you call defects I like to call signs of God’s magnanimity.

    I guess we’ll just have to wait for the Day of Judgment to see who was right since both sides claim their theory to be provable but not falsifiable.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
    1. leron

      bravo

      3 years ago  ∞
      Reply
  51. Martintfre

    Lamarck was thinking that physiological changes would be passed on. Genetics was not yet understood so they were making the best guess they could with the tools they had.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  52. baxizach

    i think she meant to dumb it down for the retarded fuckwit creationists inbread morons that believe in magic and all that

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  53. jeffmagic32

    it comes down to probabilities, not certainties. I have type 1 diabetes. My kids are more likely than yours to also have it. If the mom also has diabetes, our kids are even more likely to have it.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  54. davidheromany

    NERDS ALL OF YOU NERDS

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  55. davidheromany

    NERD

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  56. davidheromany

    PERVART

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  57. DuralastTurbo

    Look down, clown =)

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  58. Can something that exists originate from absolute nothing? The simple and logical conclusion to the question can be simply wiped from the mind like the wet booger on the tip of your finger, though.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  59. netiaz

    It’s better than Bible stories.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  60. netiaz

    This video explains how Old Greg came about.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  61. aerobique

    TO ALL RELIGIONS
    brothers and sisters- yeaH!

    OUR NATURE ON EARTH -no matter where it comes from-(since today i call it:UNAE)
    ->is our all god.

    Your gods know it.

    And they cry all day.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  62. cariosus

    “Genetic (deformities) are rarely passed on” Deny the big bang, abiogenesis, evolution, etc. all you want. But to say “deformities” are “rarely passed on” (and back it up with ‘no 2 headed snakes’) boggles my mind. Please read a Biology book. Please.

    …You do realize that two headed snakes are in fact two snakes, no? Tell me that was a joke.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  63. Howie47

    DNA has a mechanism that prevents most point mutations from being passed on. Natural selection, ‘weeds out’, harmful mutations over time. To be abopted, mutations must be instantly beneficial to survival.
    That isn’t observed. Isn’t tangible. But is the only hope of DEAD Neo-Darwinism.
    Which is the only hope of the God, ignorant
    materialist.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  64. cariosus

    If you believe this, you’ve simply misunderstood the nature of DNA, evolution, natural selection, mutations and Neo-Darwinism.
    ps. sickle cell anemia

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  65. Howie47

    Sickle cell proves my rule also. It is naturally deselected from populations removed from epidemic malaria locations.
    In these single point diseases, modern medicine has interrupted natural selection. By
    allowing longer life of the victims, and encouraging their continued reproduction.
    However we don’t see these single point mutations accumulating into new morphological
    characteristics. (super humans)
    Doesn’t happen, the idea is a lame fairy tale.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  66. Laspher

    Pfft Bible stories OWNS.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  67. GoodScienceForYou

    The theroy of evolution is a complete false premise that any creatures have ever evolved in the natural world in to other species or from other genus. It is the most ridiculous mass hysteria on the planet. How stupid is it to follow a belief and call it “science”?

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  68. dtlegend72

    this video is rediculous mutations r never helpful and always hurtful or nuetral and neo-darwinism wasnt even darwins theory it was devries

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  69. DanBen514

    mutations are not always hurtful at all..

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  70. Jeremyguru

    “…mutations r never helpful…” That is not true. You are ignorant. Please go get a basic science education at a proper university…and I don’t mean bible “school.”

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  71. Jeremyguru

    The only problem with evolutionary theory is that you clearly don’t understand it. Go get an education.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  72. 45a66

    was that about the dinosaw?
    No, think it was somrones birthday, well, anyway give the radiation back to nature, I would like to see this gripdinosawhawk after this stoneage.
    good hunting.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  73. dtlegend72

    why do you call me ignorant do you even have any proof to back up what u r sayin
    Ohh and by technical terms, evolution is not science IT IS THEORY

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  74. dtlegend72

    i didnt say they were always harmful
    i said they ethier hurt u or dont effect u
    but there has never been a mutation that helped u

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  75. dtlegend72

    hmm u know i thought evolution was supposed to be random
    and yet the very words “natural selection” means nature chooses

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  76. Jeremyguru

    Again, you show your complete ignorance of basic science. Yes, evolution is a “theory” just like atomic theory, gravitational theory and germ theory. Do you not believe in atoms, gravity or germs?

    You need to go to school and learn what a SCIENTIFIC THEORY means.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  77. cariosus

    It’s a misconception… MUTATION is random. Having a gene that makes animals faster won’t mutate/exist sooner because it’s useful, but if/when it DOES mutate, nature “chooses” it because that gene has an obvious advantage over “slow” genes. So that gene lives on in fast animals that reproduce because they have a higher fitness than slow ones. (”Fitness” in Biology)

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  78. dtlegend72

    u still havent answered my question
    what is your proof

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  79. dtlegend72

    you still said nature chooses
    youve just given it a mind

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  80. dtlegend72

    im also talkin about the definition of true science
    that it must be repeatable,recordable, and tanjable

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  81. Jeremyguru

    Proof? It’s been proven to the point of over-kill. Go study science. You’ll find all the evidence you’ll ever need.

    It’s not my job to teach you science. It’s YOUR responsibility to get an education. You’ve already demonstrated the you don’t even understand basic science terms. Go learn.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  82. XCHAPYEG

    I believe in both God and the evolution theory. Intellegent Design, anyone?

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  83. SuperFinGuy

    “MUTATION is random”

    No it is not. Mutation is induced. It is called mutagenesis. This has been proven in the lad, while random mutation is just an after the fact rationalization.

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  84. cariosus

    “Factors in the environment are thought to influence the rate of mutation but are not generally thought to influence the direction of mutation. For example, exposure to harmful chemicals may increase the mutation rate, but will not cause more mutations that make the organism resistant to those chemicals. In this respect, mutations are random—whether a particular mutation happens or not is generally unrelated to how useful that mutation would be.”

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply
  85. cariosus

    evolution[.]berkeley[.]edu/evosite/evo101/IIIC1aRandom[.]shtml

    3 years ago  ∞
    Reply

Leave a comment

Allowed HTML: <a> <img> <object> <embed> <b> <i> <strike> <blockquote> <code>
Sign up for Gravatar for a user icon


Recent Comments



[x] Close this window.