Battledecks
Source: n7hlyC7NPUc

Story links: Battledecks contestants improvise conference presentations from previously unseen powerpoint slides. Jeff Tidwell is the moderator. Judges include Erika Hall and Jonathan Grubb. Contestants include George Kelly, Ted Rheingold, Rob Weichert, Jon Armstrong and Anil Dash.


29 On-site Responses:
  1. leron says:

    Uh huh.

    Was there, like, a big tank of nitrous oxide hissing away in one corner of the room?

    I feel really old suddenly.

  2. Mike_Dixon says:

    Hey, the human wit can be astonishing. In my case astonishing slow. I sense something, then it takes a long time for a thought to form. Then an even longer time for that thought to finally be articulated.
    Therefore it is unreservedly fascinating for me to watch quick-witted others, especially whom are under pressure from a live audience, with rolling cameras to boot. I’d cave. These people are keenly talented.

  3. Sean E says:

    If you want to have a better future for our children in Malaysia, do your part by signing the on-line petition at http://www.petitiononline.com/RCER2008/petition.html

    This is one way to bring our message to the Government.

    Don’92t just sit there, stand up and be counted! We want a fair and transparent election.

    WHY DO WE NEED TO REFORM THE ELECTION COMMISSION?

    1) Gerrymandering. The discrepancy between number of voters in voting areas is too great. The smallest parliamentary seat (Federal Territory, Putrajaya) has only 6,608 voters while the parliamentary seat for Kapar in Selangor has 112,224 voters. What this means is that one vote in the Putrajaya parliamentary constituency is equivalent to 17 votes in the Kapar constituency.

    2) Phantom voters. A common tactic is to ’91buy’92 the identity card of the voters. Party members from the ruling parties will then vote on the voters’92 behalf. Random checking of a person’92s identity must be conducted using those finger print checking device (like the bank use). Any voting done on another person’92s identity must be made a serious offence under the election law.

    3) Postal votes. The rules on postal voting must be reviewed, tightened and amended. The current rule favours the ruling party as the armed forces personnel and policemen who vote by ’91postal voting’92 would obviously not jeopardize their career or promotion prospect by voting for the opposition. Voting under postal voting is not secret as it is under the watchful eyes of the senior officers. Christina Liew of DAP (Api-Api) lost due to postal votes. The ruling party has control of 250,000 postal votes!

    4) Spoiled votes. How do we define spoiled votes. It is very easy to turn good votes into spoiled votes (by adding one more x to the ballot paper). Are spoiled votes being verified and watched over by the party representatives? In marginal areas in which the winning margin is razor thin, the so-called spoiled votes need to be scrutinized.

  4. Ryan Freitas says:

    Sorry, guys. “Brian Credus” is close… no cigar, tho. The name is Freitas, and drop the “B” on my first name – Adaptive Path has enough Brians already. Thanks for the hilight reel!

  5. stoley says:

    SZSW represents a sickness of sorts. The town of Austin has been destroyed. The conference industry is
    privately owned and for profit. That is the bad karma and bullshit, they milk the youth from “volunteers”
    but nothing substantial is covered. The Music and Art is for the most part just as vacant as the volunteers.
    SXSW is a self-appreciation society.

Leave a Reply

*




Facebook Comments:





Posted by | on | Filed under Daily News

home | video archives | about | chat | youtube | subscribe