New tests are being run to determine if our universe is being operated by a computer program. John Conway’s Game of Life, Are You Living in a Computer Simulation? by Nick Bostrom, Constraints on the Universe as a Numerical Simulation
Daily News, Life, Shows ⋅
| Permalink
| YouTube
| Credits
Mollyyyyyyyyyyyy
just like when we dream
I've wasted tons of time on John Conway's Game of Life.
Actually I am not a Christian, and yes I do know something can pop out of nothingness, I was trying lead on Tiagos argument, into the fact that if the universe can pull itself out of nothingness, then a God can as well. In fact when we deal with the multi-verse, and parallel realities, anything can exist and must exist in order for reality to be complete. My belief in God has nothing to do with structured religions, I just believe that the sum of the entirety of our reality is a conscious being.
That's not a very nice thing to say. The computer simulation theory is just a modernized version of the brains in a box theory. Obviously, computers weren't mentioned before computers were invented.
That's not a very nice thing to say. The computer simulation theory is just a modernized version of the brains in a box theory. Obviously, computers weren't mentioned before computers were invented.
That's not a very nice thing to say. The computer simulation theory is just a modernized version of the brains in a box theory. Obviously, computers weren't mentioned before computers were invented.
Thats a valid point. Many of the greatest discoveries and inventions came about while researching an unrelated subject.
Thats a valid point. Many of the greatest discoveries and inventions came about while researching an unrelated subject.
Thats a valid point. Many of the greatest discoveries and inventions came about while researching an unrelated subject.
Well, computer simulation seems to be like 'brain in a box,' but it's (at least the one proposed in this video) more akin to Aristotle's 'spontaneous generation.' It wasn't very nice to say, apologies. I don't like being smartassed to b/c I'm a smartass.
Well, computer simulation seems to be like 'brain in a box,' but it's (at least the one proposed in this video) more akin to Aristotle's 'spontaneous generation.' It wasn't very nice to say, apologies. I don't like being smartassed to b/c I'm a smartass.
Well, computer simulation seems to be like 'brain in a box,' but it's (at least the one proposed in this video) more akin to Aristotle's 'spontaneous generation.' It wasn't very nice to say, apologies. I don't like being smartassed to b/c I'm a smartass.
of course were real...these people watch too much tv...or they ran out of other bullshit stuff to waste taxpayers money on. after all studies arent free you know
of course were real...these people watch too much tv...or they ran out of other bullshit stuff to waste taxpayers money on. after all studies arent free you know
of course were real...these people watch too much tv...or they ran out of other bullshit stuff to waste taxpayers money on. after all studies arent free you know
time doesn't exist x
time doesn't exist x
time doesn't exist x
i just found this channel and wow, its a gold mine for tech info and delivered with a sarcastic tone \o/, even their videos from 5 years ago are awesome. i want to kill myself for not knowing this channel for so long
i just found this channel and wow, its a gold mine for tech info and delivered with a sarcastic tone \o/, even their videos from 5 years ago are awesome. i want to kill myself for not knowing this channel for so long
i just found this channel and wow, its a gold mine for tech info and delivered with a sarcastic tone \o/, even their videos from 5 years ago are awesome. i want to kill myself for not knowing this channel for so long
Huh?
let me build off your analogy. There was no negative point of time when the space was inclosed inside the walls before the walls where built. Time and space only began from the point of view of inside the universe (the room) If you step outside of this universe then time and space have an even further origin. Much like outside the room. Its very likely that the big bang just came from another system. The nature of that system we may not know much about.
let me build off your analogy. There was no negative point of time when the space was inclosed inside the walls before the walls where built. Time and space only began from the point of view of inside the universe (the room) If you step outside of this universe then time and space have an even further origin. Much like outside the room. Its very likely that the big bang just came from another system. The nature of that system we may not know much about.
let me build off your analogy. There was no negative point of time when the space was inclosed inside the walls before the walls where built. Time and space only began from the point of view of inside the universe (the room) If you step outside of this universe then time and space have an even further origin. Much like outside the room. Its very likely that the big bang just came from another system. The nature of that system we may not know much about.
Yet, research money is only a fraction of what we spend on the military.
Yet, research money is only a fraction of what we spend on the military.
Yet, research money is only a fraction of what we spend on the military.
No, Time already existed before the walls were built around that space, and so there was a point in time where that space didn't had walls around it but was already there. Time wasn't extremely curved right after the room was made, it was way flatter than back when the Big Bang was happening. In your room analogy there are "negative points in time", there is a before.
No, Time already existed before the walls were built around that space, and so there was a point in time where that space didn't had walls around it but was already there. Time wasn't extremely curved right after the room was made, it was way flatter than back when the Big Bang was happening. In your room analogy there are "negative points in time", there is a before.
No, Time already existed before the walls were built around that space, and so there was a point in time where that space didn't had walls around it but was already there. Time wasn't extremely curved right after the room was made, it was way flatter than back when the Big Bang was happening. In your room analogy there are "negative points in time", there is a before.
Depends on how you define "exist"
Depends on how you define "exist"
maybe time moves backwards in the simulation but we experience it as moving forward so everything that happened before now hasn't happened yet
maybe time moves backwards in the simulation but we experience it as moving forward so everything that happened before now hasn't happened yet
maybe time moves backwards in the simulation but we experience it as moving forward so everything that happened before now hasn't happened yet
No
Hack the planet! No, HACK THE UNIVERSE!!!
Hack the planet! No, HACK THE UNIVERSE!!!
First.
you completely missed the point of the room analogy. Outside = Multi-verse.
you completely missed the point of the room analogy. Outside = Multi-verse.
you completely missed the point of the room analogy. Outside = Multi-verse.
"Outside" isn't the same thing as "Before". For there to be a "Before", there has to be Time, but Time itself only started existing with the Big Bang.
"Outside" isn't the same thing as "Before". For there to be a "Before", there has to be Time, but Time itself only started existing with the Big Bang.
The point of my analogy is that time only began in this universe. There is no reason to believe that time dosent exist elsewhere. If you are only capable of existing inside rooms, then the room has to be built for you to perceive existence and you are incapable of perceiving "outside" then time can only begin once the room has been built. You need to figure out how to get outside the room to be able to perceive the events that happened outside this universe that led up to the big bang.
The point of my analogy is that time only began in this universe. There is no reason to believe that time dosent exist elsewhere. If you are only capable of existing inside rooms, then the room has to be built for you to perceive existence and you are incapable of perceiving "outside" then time can only begin once the room has been built. You need to figure out how to get outside the room to be able to perceive the events that happened outside this universe that led up to the big bang.
The point of my analogy is that time only began in this universe. There is no reason to believe that time dosent exist elsewhere. If you are only capable of existing inside rooms, then the room has to be built for you to perceive existence and you are incapable of perceiving "outside" then time can only begin once the room has been built. You need to figure out how to get outside the room to be able to perceive the events that happened outside this universe that led up to the big bang.
-facepalm- You really don't get it, do you? Our universe is only assumed to be all that exists. there is no evidence that such an assumption is remotely true, and significant evidence in contrary.
In my analogy "outside" dose indeed equate "before" because "outside" existed before "inside" but unfortunately you have provided reason to believe you are resistance to thinking in any other form than the litteral.
-facepalm- You really don't get it, do you? Our universe is only assumed to be all that exists. there is no evidence that such an assumption is remotely true, and significant evidence in contrary.
In my analogy "outside" dose indeed equate "before" because "outside" existed before "inside" but unfortunately you have provided reason to believe you are resistance to thinking in any other form than the litteral.
-facepalm- You really don't get it, do you? Our universe is only assumed to be all that exists. there is no evidence that such an assumption is remotely true, and significant evidence in contrary.
In my analogy "outside" dose indeed equate "before" because "outside" existed before "inside" but unfortunately you have provided reason to believe you are resistance to thinking in any other form than the litteral.
First. Again.
Third.
If we are living in a computer simulation, I got to say it has great graphics, but shitty gameplay... Oh and don't get mi started on the "Save/Load" options
If we are living in a computer simulation, I got to say it has great graphics, but shitty gameplay... Oh and don't get mi started on the "Save/Load" options
If we are living in a computer simulation, I got to say it has great graphics, but shitty gameplay... Oh and don't get mi started on the "Save/Load" options
They usually assume that today's laws of physics came to be just after the big bang, which might even mean that back then there was no such thing as gravity.
They usually assume that today's laws of physics came to be just after the big bang, which might even mean that back then there was no such thing as gravity.
I just slapped my keyboard with my dick when I wrote that.
I guess you just really wanna express your opinion, I guess. Just know that this is purely philosophic...if this universe would be a simulation we would have as much knowing about it as an NPC.
I just slapped my keyboard with my dick when I wrote that.
I guess you just really wanna express your opinion, I guess. Just know that this is purely philosophic...if this universe would be a simulation we would have as much knowing about it as an NPC.
We are all getting tested by glados
We are all getting tested by glados
What about the computer program that's running our universe? That's in a universe... right?... UNIVERSECEPTION
What about the computer program that's running our universe? That's in a universe... right?... UNIVERSECEPTION
well yeah, that's kind of the point of the video.
well yeah, that's kind of the point of the video.